I revisited an online bulletin for alums in my major at art school. I read a post I made two years ago responding to the question, Do you enjoy where you live? I think I still believe now what I wrote then in 2005:
+++
I've been living in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam for two years now. Yesterday, in a cafe, I was rereading an essay by Susan Sontag about anthropologists:
"The anthropologist's vocation requires the assumption of profound detachment. (Quoting Claude Levi-Strauss) "Never can he feel himself 'at home' anywhere, he will always be, psychologically speaking, an amputee". - Claude Levi-Strauss in Susan Sontag's "The Anthropologist as a Hero"
What struck me about what Sontag was saying is that for some artists, and certainly for me, practicing art is also an act of voluntary amputation. You know the advantages of comfortable living, yet each of us has chosen to embrace a little risk at the expense of a prescribed life. I still feel my phantom limb, those pangs of what I miss most about America (free press, bookstores, trashy television). I miss education and I miss being able to find things when I need them. But one, in time, becomes familiar with disability, locating temporary prosthetics and ultimately, one forgets that they have braces when they smile.
Certainly time spent at home offers adventures. I see it like an extreme rock climber, taking risk but always a sport of familiar terrain. Until one day, the climber finds his leg jammed between two stones. One can either waste away or one can cut themselves loose.
I can't say whether or not I've chosen the right place. My instinct tells me that Beijing, Havana and perhaps Berlin are in the future. It is clear that I'm interested interested in places undergoing rapid change. Also, in the same essay Levi-Strauss is said to believe that the anthropologist is a witness to dying culture (during a period of colonization where 'first contacts' usually meant the decimation of entire cultures through disease, warfare, slavery). Such is the practice and struggle of art. To maintain culture in a larger society that could care less. I currently live in one of only a handful of remaining communist states. To see the rapid changes, the growing pains, the struggles of nations and cities in transition is the energy from which my work borrows. I'm never really 'at home' anywhere, but that, for me, speaks to an artist's life. And that is why I like where I live.
Posted by on February 6, 2007 2:29 AM | Permalink

There have been great benefits to me in relocating to TPHCM from the comfort of San Francisco -- it has been liberating in that I can refocus on issues of interest instead of being watered down by the comfortable distractions and clutter of home. And I am finding a basic tacit knowledge and interest in art and culture here that is resulting in some some very interesting house and interior architecture (but is not yet extending to large buildings). There are very interesting debates going on within the city government right now about the future of TPHCM and the urban environment to result from plans. This will be a very interesting place to live and work for the next few years. However, there are and will be many frustrating times as an outsider.
-- Mel
I guess we all feel like anthropologists here.
I don't miss the trashy TV though...
cha`o anh rich,
khoe khong? glad to hear that you're still enjoying "cutting yourself loose" as an artist in VN... and around the world... as for home,
"when there is no place that you have decided to call your own, then no matter where you go you are always heading home."
~muso soseki
sometimes i feel like i'm still searching too... but hopefully the horsie in me will finally settle down n find a place to really call "home" - til then, sacto, boston, sacto2, hawai`i, malaysia, vietnam, thailand, n maybe europe are all planned 4 the near future :) perhaps we'll finally be able to meet up in VN - august?
tam biet, nhe? ~linh
Wouldn't you say, also, that art doesn't merely seek to "maintain" culture(s) but to also critique and dialogue with? Art kg chi "bao ton" nhung gi thoang qua, nhung cung la mot linh kinh, mot tam guong, de cho xa hoi van hoa hieu ro hon (or at least w/ a different perspective) nhu the nao minh da - va dang - thay doi, de co the nhan biet duoc nhung duong huong cua qua khu trong khi minh tim kiem nhung duong huong moi cua tuong lai... Khi minh noi art la de "maintain culture in a larger society that could care less", minh (possibly?) assume rang chi co mot sense of culture co the ton tai, va minh nghi rang phai dung art de (kg phai sustain) nhung de kem che mot che do, mot normative. Khi minh noi vay, co phai la minh qua restrictive trong dinh nghia cua art? Rich, this is such a fascinating topic. Thanks for sharing.